<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel><title>IPI PolicyBytes | Categorised Content</title><description>News, Notes, and Opinions From the Institute for Policy Innovation (IPI)</description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/</link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:51:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<item><title>SoundBytes 224: What Will the President Say in His State of the Union?</title><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:43:09 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ <em>What Will the President Say in His State of the Union?</em> The Institute for Policy Innovation&#8217;s Dr. Merrill Matthews says he has some explaining to do. <br /> <br />Washington is all atwitter over President Obama&#8217;s upcoming State of the Union address. And understandably so, because the president has some serious explaining to do, like: <br /> <ul> <li>How he plans to get control of the $1.4 trillion federal deficit, more than three times the deficit Obama was so critical of under George Bush. </li></ul> <ul> <li>And how he intends to pay for all the Democrats&#8217; new federal spending. Yes, he could raise taxes, but he already has several new taxes in his health care bill.</li></ul> <ul> <li>And maybe the president can explain why his much-boasted stimulus bill has had little impact on creating new jobs.</li></ul>]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-224-what-will-the-president-say-in-his-state-of-the-union.htm</link><dc:subject>SoundBytes podcasts</dc:subject><dc:creator>Merrill Matthews Jr.</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-224-what-will-the-president-say-in-his-state-of-the-union.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-224-what-will-the-president-say-in-his-state-of-the-union.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/soundbytes-224-what-will-the-president-say-in-his-state-of-the-union.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-224-what-will-the-president-say-in-his-state-of-the-union.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>SoundBytes 223: Can Congress Force You to Buy Health Insurance?</title><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:34:19 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ <em>Can Congress Force You to Buy Health Insurance? </em>Dr. Merrill Matthews of the Institute for Policy Innovation says only by ignoring the Constitution. <br /> <br />The health care reform legislation in Congress requires every American to have health insurance or pay a significant fine. But where does the U.S. Constitution give Congress that power? <br /> <br />Cyber News Service posed the question, and Democrats seemed to fumble for an answer. <br /> <br />Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska is quoted as saying, &#8220;probably the same place that states have the authority to require, mandate if you will, compulsory auto liability insurance.&#8221; Claire McCaskill and some other Democrats agree. <br /> <br />Of course, state constitutions are completely independent documents and have no bearing on powers granted by the U.S. Constitution. <br /> <br />That document sets strict limits on federal power.]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-223-can-congress-force-you-to-buy-health-insurance.htm</link><dc:subject>SoundBytes podcasts</dc:subject><dc:creator>Merrill Matthews Jr.</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-223-can-congress-force-you-to-buy-health-insurance.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-223-can-congress-force-you-to-buy-health-insurance.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/soundbytes-223-can-congress-force-you-to-buy-health-insurance.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-223-can-congress-force-you-to-buy-health-insurance.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>SoundBytes 222: Are You Looking for a Good-Paying Job? </title><pubDate>Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:28:35 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ <em>Are You Looking for a Good-Paying Job?</em> The Institute for Policy Innovation&#8217;s Dr. Merrill Matthews says you might try the government, it&#8217;s hiring and it pays very well. <br /> <br /><em>USA Today</em> reports that the number of federal employees making more than $100,000 a year is exploding. One in five now rakes in six-figure salaries. <br /> <br />In just 18 months: <br /> <ul> <li>Defense Department workers making more than $150,000 grew from nearly 2,000 employees to more than 10,000.</li></ul> <ul> <li>And the Transportation Department went from one person making $170,000 or more to 1,700 employees.</li></ul> <br />A government spokesperson says these are highly qualified people, and make less than the private sector. But federal employees also get much better benefits, all at taxpayers&#8217; expense. <br /> <br />President Obama said he wanted to create a lot of high-paying jobs. Problem is, they&#8217;re all government jobs.]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-222are-you-looking-for-a-good-paying-job-.htm</link><dc:subject>SoundBytes podcasts</dc:subject><dc:creator>Merrill Matthews Jr.</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-222are-you-looking-for-a-good-paying-job-.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-222are-you-looking-for-a-good-paying-job-.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/soundbytes-222are-you-looking-for-a-good-paying-job-.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-222are-you-looking-for-a-good-paying-job-.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>SoundBytes 221: Is It Time for Some Congressional New Year’s Resolutions?</title><pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:53:24 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ <em>Is It Time for Some Congressional New Year&#8217;s Resolutions?</em> Dr. Merrill Matthews of the Institute for Policy Innovation says yes, before Congress bankrupts the country<strong>.</strong> <br /> <br />It&#8217;s time once again to encourage Congress to make some New Year&#8217;s resolutions. <br /> <br />First, with the national debt limit being pushed up to about $14 trillion and no end in sight, members of Congress must resolve to get federal spending under control. <br /> <br />The second resolution should be a commitment to more bipartisanship. This is the most partisan and polarized administration in recent history, barely able to get one or two Republicans to vote for a bill. <br /> <br />Third, Congress needs to be more transparent. Democrats are ramming through major legislation without letting Republicans or the public even see the bill, much less read it, until they&#8217;re ready to pass it. <br /> <br />Folks, this is no way to run a country.]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-221-is-it-time-for-some-congressional-new-year’s-resolutions.htm</link><dc:subject>SoundBytes podcasts</dc:subject><dc:creator>Merrill Matthews Jr.</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-221-is-it-time-for-some-congressional-new-year’s-resolutions.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-221-is-it-time-for-some-congressional-new-year’s-resolutions.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/soundbytes-221-is-it-time-for-some-congressional-new-year’s-resolutions.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-221-is-it-time-for-some-congressional-new-year’s-resolutions.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>SoundBytes 220: What is the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution?</title><pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:33:31 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ <em>What is the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution?</em> The Institute for Policy Innovation&#8217;s Dr. Merrill Matthews says Washington may have forgotten. <br /> <br />The U.S. Constitution&#8217;s Tenth Amendment, which is part of the Bill of Rights, says that powers not given to the federal government belong to the states or the people. <br /> <br />So ask yourself, where does the Constitution give the federal government the power to: <br /> <ul> <li>Mandate people have health insurance or pay a fine; </li></ul> <ul> <li>Own and operate a major car company;</li></ul> <ul> <li>Tell bank executives they have to take government money or else?</li></ul> <br />It doesn&#8217;t, and yet the federal government has done or wants to do all of that and more. <br /> <br />The Tenth Amendment expressly limits the power of the federal government. If Congress continues to ignore those limitations, then the public needs to impose its own limits&#8212;on the terms of those elected to Congress.]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-220-what-is-the-tenth-amendment-of-the-constitution.htm</link><dc:subject>SoundBytes podcasts</dc:subject><dc:creator>Merrill Matthews Jr.</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-220-what-is-the-tenth-amendment-of-the-constitution.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-220-what-is-the-tenth-amendment-of-the-constitution.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/soundbytes-220-what-is-the-tenth-amendment-of-the-constitution.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-220-what-is-the-tenth-amendment-of-the-constitution.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>SoundBytes 218: Is the Stimulus Money Creating Jobs?</title><pubDate>Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:28:11 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ <em>Is the Stimulus Money Creating Jobs?</em> Dr. Merrill Matthews of the Institute for Policy Innovation says yes, but for most Americans it&#8217;s a long commute. <br /> <br />One goal of President Obama&#8217;s stimulus bill was to create environmentally friendly &#8220;green jobs.&#8221; <br /> <br />And it&#8217;s done just that. The <em>Washington Times </em>reports that 11 U.S. wind farms have bought nearly 1,000 electricity-producing wind turbines, creating about 4,500 jobs, uh, oversees. <br /> <br />See, nearly 700 of those turbines were bought from China. <br /> <br />Now a new American-Chinese joint venture just announced it plans to buy nearly 250 Chinese-made turbines. That venture wants 30 percent of its $1.5 billion in funding from the stimulus money. <br /> <br />So if you&#8217;ve been looking for work for a while, you need to know that taxpayer-financed stimulus money is creating jobs. <br /> <br />And you might even be able to get one of them.]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-218-is-the-stimulus-money-creating-jobs.htm</link><dc:subject>SoundBytes podcasts</dc:subject><dc:creator>Merrill Matthews Jr.</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-218-is-the-stimulus-money-creating-jobs.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-218-is-the-stimulus-money-creating-jobs.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/soundbytes-218-is-the-stimulus-money-creating-jobs.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-218-is-the-stimulus-money-creating-jobs.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>SoundBytes 217: Are Pets a Threat to the Environment?</title><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:44:29 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ <em>Are Pets a Threat to the Environment? </em>The Institute for Policy Innovation&#8217;s Dr. Merrill Matthews says there&#8217;s an even bigger threat. <br /> <br />Two professors from Victoria University in New Zealand have discovered a new threat to the planet: your pets. <br /> <br />They claim that a dog&#8217;s carbon &#8220;pawprint&#8221; is twice that of an SUV driven 6,000 miles a year. Cat&#8217;s are less damaging, about like owning a Volkswagen. <br /> <br />The primary reason, say the husband and wife professors, is it takes a lot of resources to create meat for dog and cat food. <br /> <br />Keeping such pets is unsustainable in the long term, so the authors called their book <em>Time to Eat the Dog?</em> <br /> <br />They recommend people switch to other pets, such as chickens and pigs, which can be eaten. <br /> <br />But while the book&#8217;s provocative, the premise is nonsense. We&#8217;d be better off keeping our pets and letting them eat the authors.]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-217-are-pets-a-threat-to-the-environment.htm</link><dc:subject>SoundBytes podcasts</dc:subject><dc:creator>Merrill Matthews Jr.</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-217-are-pets-a-threat-to-the-environment.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-217-are-pets-a-threat-to-the-environment.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/soundbytes-217-are-pets-a-threat-to-the-environment.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-217-are-pets-a-threat-to-the-environment.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>SoundBytes 215: Is the President’s Stimulus a Success?</title><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:30:04 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ <em>Is the President&#8217;s Stimulus a Success?</em> The Institute for Policy Innovation&#8217;s Dr. Merrill Matthews says it depends on what one mean&#8217;s by success. <br /> <br />President Obama says his $787 billion stimulus package is a huge success. <br /> <br />Even though the economy&#8217;s lost more than 2 million jobs, the administration boasts that federal contractors who received $16 billion in stimulus money have created or saved 30,000 jobs. <br /> <br />As the ProPublica website points out, that&#8217;s spending more than $500,000 per job. <br /> <br />Hey, where do I sign up? <br /> <br />The administration also claims that for every direct job, an indirect job has been created or saved. So maybe 60,000 jobs. <br /> <br />Democrats now say the first stimulus was such a success they may want to do another. But if the first one had really created jobs, we wouldn&#8217;t need a second.]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-215-is-the-president’s-stimulus-a-success.htm</link><dc:subject>SoundBytes podcasts</dc:subject><dc:creator>Merrill Matthews Jr.</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-215-is-the-president’s-stimulus-a-success.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-215-is-the-president’s-stimulus-a-success.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/soundbytes-215-is-the-president’s-stimulus-a-success.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-215-is-the-president’s-stimulus-a-success.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>SoundBytes 214: Why Is No One Running the Medicare Program?</title><pubDate>Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:40:38 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ <em>Why Is No One Running the Medicare Program?</em><em> </em>Dr. Merrill Matthews of the Institute for Policy Innovation says the president may be avoiding some difficult questions. <br /> <br /> Health care is important to President Obama, so you&#8217;d think after nine months in office he would have appointed someone to head the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. <br /> <br /> That&#8217;s the federal agency that manages the Medicare program for seniors and Medicaid for the poor. Together they cover about 85 million Americans. <br /> <br /> But maybe it isn&#8217;t so strange. The appointment needs Senate approval, allowing senators to discuss Medicare&#8217;s $90 trillion in unfunded liabilities. Or why Medicare fraud is an estimated $60 billion or more a year. <br />]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-214-why-is-no-one-running-the-medicare-program.htm</link><dc:subject>SoundBytes podcasts</dc:subject><dc:creator>Merrill Matthews Jr.</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-214-why-is-no-one-running-the-medicare-program.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-214-why-is-no-one-running-the-medicare-program.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/soundbytes-214-why-is-no-one-running-the-medicare-program.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-214-why-is-no-one-running-the-medicare-program.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>SoundBytes 213: Has Smokey the Bear Moved to Washington?</title><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:16:44 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ <em>Has Smokey the Bear Moved to Washington?</em> The Institute for Policy innovation&#8217;s Dr. Merrill Matthews says only you can prevent wasteful government spending. <br /> <br />The country&#8217;s forests are a national treasure. That&#8217;s why Congress appropriated millions of dollars in the stimulus bill for forest fire management, including $2.8 million for that much-loved national forest known as &#8230; Washington, D.C. <br /> <br />Now, Washington has its problems, but forest fires aren&#8217;t one of them <br /> <br />Steve Moore of <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> reports that when Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming discovered the funding, he introduced an amendment to reassign it to the U.S. Forest Service. The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Ironically, Wyoming, which has lots of forests, got no forest fire management money. <br /> <br />Smokey the Bear used to say, &#8220;Only you can prevent forest fires.&#8221; And, I might add, only you can prevent Congre]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-213-has-smokey-the-bear-moved-to-washington.htm</link><dc:subject>SoundBytes podcasts</dc:subject><dc:creator>Merrill Matthews Jr.</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-213-has-smokey-the-bear-moved-to-washington.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-213-has-smokey-the-bear-moved-to-washington.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/soundbytes-213-has-smokey-the-bear-moved-to-washington.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/soundbytes-213-has-smokey-the-bear-moved-to-washington.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>

</channel></rss>
